Disagreements in quantity measurement and valuation – how can we avoid them?
Quantity measurement and valuation is central to civil works contracts — and a frequent source of conflict. Insights from a KTH thesis and practical steps to reduce disputes with clearer BoQs, dialogue and digital tools.
Disagreements in quantity measurement and valuation – how can we avoid them?
Quantity measurement and valuation is a central part of civil works contracts, but also a source of many conflicts between contractors and clients. In a thesis from KTH Royal Institute of Technology, carried out by Caroline Germundson in collaboration with SVEAB Anläggning, several important challenges and possible improvements in quantity measurement and valuation were identified. Here we share the insights and discuss solutions for a smoother process.
Why do conflicts arise in quantity measurement and valuation?
In a unit-price / remeasurement contract (utförandeentreprenad), the contractor’s payment is based on executed quantities that are measured and reported as the project progresses. However, Bills of Quantities (BoQ) — prepared by the client — often do not reflect reality. This can lead to:
- Unclear conditions that leave room for individual interpretations.
- Financial deviations that negatively affect both contractors and clients.
- Time-consuming reporting that often lacks clear guidelines.
These factors create fertile ground for misunderstandings and disputes, which affect projects both financially and operationally.
What does the thesis say?
According to the study, quantity measurement and valuation needs clearer rules and better processes. Some key insights:
- Vague frameworks: Contractors and clients interpret the rules differently. As a result, disputes about quantity changes often arise even before the works begin.
- Financial impact: Errors in the Bill of Quantities lead to increased costs for the client and make it harder for the contractor to plan labour and resources.
- Practical obstacles: Today’s quantity measurement and valuation process is inefficient and consumes a great deal of the contractor’s time and resources.
How can we improve quantity measurement and valuation?
To reduce conflicts and create a more efficient and fair process, the following steps can be taken:
1. Establish clearer tender documents: By ensuring that the tender documentation is detailed and correctly specified, you reduce room for individual interpretations and thereby lower the risk of disputes.
2. Improve communication: By increasing dialogue between client and contractor early in the project, you can ensure that all parties share a common understanding of the Bill of Quantities and its expectations.
3. Digital solutions: Modern technology, such as CASAI, can transform quantity measurement and valuation by digitalising the process, creating transparency and improving traceability. With real-time data and smart analysis, it becomes easier to keep projects within budget and schedule.
The way forward: collaboration and innovation
The thesis makes clear that quantity measurement and valuation is not only about measuring and reporting. It is a matter of collaboration, clarity and the right tools. By combining clear guidelines with digital solutions such as CASAI, we can create an industry where quantity measurement and valuation is no longer a source of conflict, but an opportunity to drive projects forward with precision and efficiency.
We appreciate Caroline Germundson’s work highlighting these important issues. Want to read the full thesis and explore the challenges and solutions in quantity measurement and valuation in more depth? Visit this link and get inspired!
Want to know more about how CASAI can help you optimise quantity measurement and valuation? Contact us today – together we shape the future of construction and civil works!